Advertisement

NFL Fantasy Football: Tight end rates of change give some cause for concern

While better than some positions, the rate of change for some tight ends serve as a cautionary tale.
Ian Miller
Ian Miller

NFL Spin Zone

Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce (87) / Kirby Lee-Imagn Images

The turntables have a funny way of turning in the realm of fantasy football. Each position bears witness to it every season.

Tight ends have a long shelf life if you are a legend. Some are merely beginning their ascent, others are at the peak and a few are climbing down from the top of the mountain.

The quarterback position shows the least amount of change, but what about the fate of the tight end? Well, in all honesty, it is more than the signal caller, but not as much as other positions. Consider this the middle of the road before we drift into changes for the worse.

Tight end: the good side of change

There is one spot that changes the least out of every position in all of fantasy football. That is the top tight end. Over the last decade, only one has left the elite fantasy tight end conversation. 

In 2025, that spot was inhabited by Trey McBride. His likelihood of remaining in the top-12 at the position stands at 90%. So, something would have to go horribly wrong for a player of his caliber to fall out.

Some may point to the quarterback room as an example of why that could happen. 

However, Gardner Minshew was a big part of Brock Bowers’ immaculate rookie season. Jacoby Brissett was the primary quarterback for McBride in 2025. So, there isn’t a ton of concern about McBride and his production.

Another great spot to be in is number three (3), with just a 30% rate of change over the last decade. Last season, that distinction went to Travis Kelce.

Unlike McBride, Kelce is on the decline of his illustrious career. He is still good, but not as great as he once was, and that is okay because he still fulfills his duties in Kansas City at a higher rate than most.

While that may make all the Swifties happy, there is one more mention of the legendary Chiefs tight end in the trends section of this article.

In addition to the aforementioned spots, slots 2, 5, 6, 8 and 12 are also relatively safe. Each of them has a 50% or lower rate of change over the last decade. 

Kyle Pitts, Harold Fannin, Juwan Johnson and Colston Loveland are all around the odds of calling a coin flip correctly to return in a similar article to this next year. While Jake Ferguson is also amongst this group, there is a trend around the fifth spot that needs further discussion.

Tight end: the bad side of change

Five spots over the previous 10 years have a 70% or higher rate of change. That is not a great outlook, but that is why an article like this is essential to warn about potential red-flag players in fantasy football.

The better side belongs to spots 7, 9 and 11. The players who held those finishing numbers last year were Dallas Goedert, Hunter Henry and Brock Bowers.

The case for Goedert is rather simple: Will Eli Stowers eat into his workload? There could be mention of A.J. Brown and any looming trade, but what else would there be to discuss about the Patriots' side of things?

Speaking of New England and Brown, the case for Henry feels rather cut and dry, too. How much are the new pass catchers going to eat into his workload from 2025? There are looming trade rumors for a certain wide receiver from Philadelphia, but do not discount Romeo Doubs; he is hungry and has shown flashes of brilliance in a crowded Green Bay receiving room.

The case for Brock Bowers is simple as well. Can he stay healthy? No one in the Las Vegas Raiders’ pass-catching room should be a threat to his status as the top option; it is all about health.

Then there were slots 4 and 10, which each hold an 80% change rate over the last decade of fantasy football.

Last season felt like a perfect storm for Dalton Schultz. Nico Collins missed a few games, and Tank Dell was gone for the entire year. Not to mention the offensive line was not great, most of the other pass-catching threats were rookies, and the running game was lackluster.

With all of those areas improving this offseason, maybe Schultz isn’t long for the top of the tight end mountain. After all, he missed the mark in 2024 in similar circumstances out in Houston.

Meanwhile, there is one case to make for Tyler Warren, and it is not even remotely related to him as a player. It boils down to the health of his quarterback, Daniel Jones, and if he can come back strong after his torn Achilles tendon last season. If Jones looks bad, odds are Warren could have a down year; if he is good, Warren is likely great again.

Tight end trends

As mentioned earlier, there are two trends to discuss. The spots in question are 3 (Kelce) and 5 (Ferguson).

For Kelce, there have only been three instances of the third spot falling out of the top-12 over the last decade. However, since 2020, a whopping 66% of them have occurred. While that is only two instances, it is a small trend to keep tabs on for the sample size of five years.

Meanwhile, there is much more substance for the fifth position. Ferguson is in real danger of falling out of the top-tier tight end conversation, according to the statistics since the turn of the decade.

While only four fifth-place finishers have fallen out of the top-12 over the last decade, 75% of them have taken place in the 2020s. While there is no correlation between tight end and quarterback in this time frame, it is worth repeating that Dak Prescott has a negative trend against him from the quarterback episode.

Ian Miller

Ian Miller