Baltimore Ravens: Defense stronger than ever, but offense remains woeful

Oct 9, 2016; Baltimore, MD, USA; Baltimore Ravens quarterback Joe Flacco (5) reacts on the sideline during the game against the Washington Redskins at M&T Bank Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Mitch Stringer-USA TODAY Sports
Oct 9, 2016; Baltimore, MD, USA; Baltimore Ravens quarterback Joe Flacco (5) reacts on the sideline during the game against the Washington Redskins at M&T Bank Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Mitch Stringer-USA TODAY Sports /
facebooktwitterreddit

The Baltimore Ravens added tremendous talent in the 2017 NFL Draft, but it’s a problem that none of them catch passes from Joe Flacco.

The defensive talent that the Baltimore Ravens added in the 2017 NFL Draft is absolutely stunning. General manager Ozzie Newsome showed his typical preference towards Alabama prospects, sure. However, they ended up adding tremendous youth, athleticism and explosion to a defense that needed those traits.

In the first round, the Ravens saw cornerback Marlon Humphrey fall to them. Versatile linebacker Tyus Bowser out of Houston was their next selection in Round 2. That pick was followed by two third-rounders in beastly defensive lineman Chris Wormley and edge rusher Tim Williams. After taking two guards in Rounds 4 and 5, they then bolstered their secondary further with Chuck Clark, a versatile player for the defensive backfield.

Defense has long been the strength of the Ravens and the heart of their identity. That dates back to Ray Lewis’ prime, in addition to the likes of Ed Reed. Heck, it was even the case a year ago. Baltimore was in the running to win the AFC North up until the final weeks of the season, though they ultimately fell short, on the shoulders of their defense.

More from NFL Spin Zone

However, one of the reasons that the Ravens spent the postseason at home was their offense. Put simply, it was an abysmal mess much of the time on that side of the ball. They solidified their offensive line with the selection of tackle Ronnie Stanley in the 2016 draft, but the problem was largely a lack of weapons, both on the outside and in the backfield.

What’s more, their lacking skill position groups were made even more shallow with the retirement of wide receiver Steve Smith Sr. His departure was something they chose not to address in free agency. Thus, going into the draft, their depth chart at receiver was highlighted by Mike Wallace and Breshad Perriman, followed by the likes of Chris Moore, Chris Matthews and Kenny Bell. Subsequently, most people had the position highlighted as a major need for them.

Instead, the Ravens left the draft with their receiving corps looking the exact same. Sure, they added undrafted free agents such as Quincy Adeboyejo and Tim Patrick, but they don’t move the needle nearly enough for this Ravens team. To make matters worse, they also didn’t draft a running back.

Frankly, it’s hard for me to see many analysts call the Ravens winners in the 2017 NFL Draft when they so glaringly ignored a position of need throughout. They didn’t need to reach to find a high-quality receiver in this class and still could’ve bolstered the defense around skill position picks. But to not even take a player in that group is absurd.

In 2016, the Ravens ranked 24th in the league in Football Outsiders‘ Offensive Defense-Adjusted Value Over Average (offensive DVOA). By the same metric, they ranked 26th in terms of passing offense and just 21st with their run game. You can understand not drafting a running back as Terrance West had moments and if the team believes in Kenneth Dixon moving forward.

However, what’s baffling is not adding a receiver to try and improve that 26th ranked offense. Wallace was a 1,000-yard receiver a year ago, but what guarantee is their that a player who’s career has been marred by wild swings and inconsistency can replicate that. What’s more, why should we believe that Perriman can stay healthy for 16 games. And even if both those things happen, there’s nothing resembling quality depth behind them, though Dennis Pitta at tight end remains a weapon.

More from Baltimore Ravens

Though a receiver in the first round wouldn’t have made sense with Corey Davis, Mike Williams and John Ross going off the board in the first nine picks, you could argue others would have. In the second round (No. 47 overall), JuJu Smith-Schuster, Cooper Kupp and Chris Godwin (among others) were still on the board. When they picked in the third round — both times — Godwin and ArDarius Stewart were available.

Even in the late rounds, they still could’ve added depth, as Jehu Chesson, Josh Malone and Chad Hansen were all available in the fourth round. They could’ve even had a high upside guy like Robert Davis out of Georgia State or a draft-faller in Isaiah Ford in the sixth round. Instead, they left with no receivers.

Having a great defense is a huge weapon in the NFL. However, it only gets you so far if you aren’t able to rely on the offense to produce with any kind of consistency. In the AFC North with the Pittsburgh Steelers and hard-nosed battles, that’s more so the case. The 2016 Denver Broncos can attest to how important offense is to competing in a strong conference. And, if not for playing in a bad AFC South, the 2016 Houston Texans would echo those sentiments.

Not only does the Ravens offense look like it won’t improve in the 2017 season following the draft, it might actually be even worse. Even if the defense is loaded, what’s the ceiling for a team that deficient on one side of the ball? 9-7? 8-8? That’s not good enough to make the postseason in the AFC.

Next: 2017 NFL Draft: Every team's worst pick

Again, the defensive talent that Baltimore added is impressive, but it came at the expense of addressing their most glaring weakness. That’s not a recipe for success, which the Ravens will find out throughout the 2017 campaign.