Aaron Rodgers and the Great QB Debate
One of my biggest pet peeves when discussing the greatest quarterbacks of all time is valuing Super Bowl rings so highly. Yes, they’re huge career accomplishments but they’re also overrated and often more a product of a great team than a great quarterback (Exhibit A: Joe Flacco).
More from NFL Spin Zone
- Dallas Cowboys made the trade everyone else should have made
- Pittsburgh Steelers rookie sleeper everyone should be talking about
- Anthony Richardson putting jaw-dropping talent on display immediately
- Denver Broncos’ stud wide receiver might be out for a while
- Washington Commanders: Three takeaways from win over Ravens
Dan Marino was a fantastic quarterback who held multiple records for long after he retired, yet he has no ring. In the future, I fear people will talk less and less about Marino as they focus on whatever young gunslingers start putting up numbers.
The point I’m trying to make: Numbers don’t mean everything. That includes championships and statistics. This applies to Aaron Rodgers, who is arguably the best quarterback in the NFL now, maybe aside from Patrick Mahomes.
I consider there to be a difference between being the best and being the greatest. Greatness encompasses career accolades and statistics. The best players are the most talented and crush the eye test. I feel like Rodgers has been overlooked in recent years because of how poorly the Packers have played, though it obviously hasn’t been his fault.
A Super Bowl ring and two MVPs help his case for greatness, but I worry he’ll never be considered among the likes of John Elway, Steve Young or even Tom Brady. This could all be an irrelevant point later on, as long as people stop disrespecting Rodgers.